<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Steal My Content!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/</link>
	<description>Miscellaneous tech tips and web development tweaks from a web hosting guru.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:09:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vili Maunula</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Vili Maunula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-407</guid>
		<description>egon -- Have you made sure that in addition to framing your website, they are not tinkering with your Adsense ads (if you run any)? I think that there are cases where they frame your site and change all the advertising point to their IDs, practically making money off your site.

I would also be a bit concerned about the possibility of the framed sites counting as double content for Google, and thus hurting your search engine rankings. But I don&#039;t know how Google handles iFrames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>egon &#8212; Have you made sure that in addition to framing your website, they are not tinkering with your Adsense ads (if you run any)? I think that there are cases where they frame your site and change all the advertising point to their IDs, practically making money off your site.</p>
<p>I would also be a bit concerned about the possibility of the framed sites counting as double content for Google, and thus hurting your search engine rankings. But I don&#8217;t know how Google handles iFrames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vili Maunula</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Vili Maunula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m painfully familiar with content theft. Even if you only maintain your websites as a recreational hobby, it hurts when someone just goes an copy-pastes an article or two. I have never really had much luck with contacting web hosts -- they either ignore you or send a message back that they can&#039;t really do much about it.

However, if the person stealing your content runs Adsense or other ads, one of the things that I have found to be the quickest way to deal with these things is to send a formal notice to the webmaster indicating that if the content is not immediately removed, you will submit a DMCA copyright notice to Google.

So far, all webmasters have rather removed the item than risked losing their Adsense subscription and possibly be removed from Google&#039;s index. (Neither of these are really that probable, and going through the DMCA process is not exactly easy for an individual blogger, but it is usually enough to scare them.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m painfully familiar with content theft. Even if you only maintain your websites as a recreational hobby, it hurts when someone just goes an copy-pastes an article or two. I have never really had much luck with contacting web hosts &#8212; they either ignore you or send a message back that they can&#8217;t really do much about it.</p>
<p>However, if the person stealing your content runs Adsense or other ads, one of the things that I have found to be the quickest way to deal with these things is to send a formal notice to the webmaster indicating that if the content is not immediately removed, you will submit a DMCA copyright notice to Google.</p>
<p>So far, all webmasters have rather removed the item than risked losing their Adsense subscription and possibly be removed from Google&#8217;s index. (Neither of these are really that probable, and going through the DMCA process is not exactly easy for an individual blogger, but it is usually enough to scare them.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mEsoL</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>mEsoL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Well Mitch, I already ask your permisssion if I can get your FirefoxFacts content to be translated to my own language before. I hope, I not the own that you point a finger at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Mitch, I already ask your permisssion if I can get your FirefoxFacts content to be translated to my own language before. I hope, I not the own that you point a finger at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clickfire</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>clickfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Yeah, this has got to be one of the most annoying things, especially for a writer who tries to take some pride in his work. I am amazed at the people who think they are actually doing a good work by republishing an article without asking. Some people just don&#039;t see intellectual property as property, it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, this has got to be one of the most annoying things, especially for a writer who tries to take some pride in his work. I am amazed at the people who think they are actually doing a good work by republishing an article without asking. Some people just don&#8217;t see intellectual property as property, it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Well in that case, it might be a little sticky.  That might not be worth going after since it is still your Web site that people are seeing.  I do believe though that there are (at least for WordPress) plugins that prevent your content from being loaded in an iframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in that case, it might be a little sticky.  That might not be worth going after since it is still your Web site that people are seeing.  I do believe though that there are (at least for WordPress) plugins that prevent your content from being loaded in an iframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: egon</title>
		<link>http://www.mitchelaneous.com/2007/01/29/dont-steal-my-content/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>egon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://64.38.8.130/~mitchela/?p=941#comment-404</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t really had people blatantly steal my content, but I have had quite a bit of directly mirroring one of my articles in their frame. So it was my site, with a frame around it. I was upset at first, then a little confused, trying to decide if I should be upset. I mean, they were bringing me traffic and revenue, and it&#039;s really not that different then coming to my site from an other link. They weren&#039;t using my content as their own, because it was still my site. What would you do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really had people blatantly steal my content, but I have had quite a bit of directly mirroring one of my articles in their frame. So it was my site, with a frame around it. I was upset at first, then a little confused, trying to decide if I should be upset. I mean, they were bringing me traffic and revenue, and it&#8217;s really not that different then coming to my site from an other link. They weren&#8217;t using my content as their own, because it was still my site. What would you do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
